4 comments
Comment from: Janine Member
I’m still trying to work out exactly why it’s become such a cult classic
Well, for me it’s a cult classic because it pretty handily rebuts, on all logical levels, every element of Judeo-Christianity – by honoring every letter of its laws. J/C is sort of founded on this absurd idea of human worthlessness and human helplessness, and then those concepts (that you are quite literally of no personal value unless you’ve been “saved,” and also that you are fundamentally incapable of understanding the difference between right and wrong without a man in a long black dress to yell at you about it for awhile two or three times a week) were bound up in a couple of thousand years’ worth of literally nonsensical folklore and outdated tribal mores, and so they turned into this sort of creepy medieval sin industry, and then, before you know it, you’ve got yourself the International Catholic Child Molesters’ League and Sarah Palin/Michele Bachmann 2012, also too. And then here’s Good Omens, and it says: You’re as good as you need to be. God wouldn’t have gone to the trouble to make you if he didn’t think you were worth the effort. No matter how far down you go or how high up you climb, you have only yourself to depend on, terrifying and amazing as that will almost certainly turn out to be. Humankind bargained away Paradise for the privilege of knowing the difference between Good and Evil, and so we are honor-bound to use that God-given gift in the best way we can every day; no one has the right to let men in black dresses do their thinking for them. And, most importantly, as Adam Young tells the assembled Hosts of Heaven and Hell on the Field of Armageddon: “I don’t see why it matters what is written. Not when it’s about people. It can always be crossed out.”
Then again, I grew up in a super-conservative Real American Town filled with Christians so nucking futs they were an actual physical threat to my existence, so probably I have slightly more interest in seeing Western religion take it on the chin than a lot of other people do.
Also: R.P. Tyler!
Bad Science: […] It’s a book-shaped rant about all the confusing bits of ’science’ that the media and advertisers like to bombard us with on a weekly basis.
I am getting this one! Thanks!
Comment from: Janine Member
That’s ok, man. I understand. Religious observances come first, after all.
Comment from: Nick Visitor
Hi Janny,
I’m glad the job is going well. I kept meaning to send you a message, but Lady Gaga has been doing so many TV appearances lately I have had to watch them on YouTube.
Ta ra,
Nick
I grew up in a super-conservative Real American Town filled with Christians so nucking futs they were an actual physical threat to my existence
Eep! That sounds scary! I’m lucky in that I grew up in a place where people are mostly ambivalent to religion so I’ve not ever really had to put up with much trouble.
Very well said though. I did enjoy how they managed to ridicule Christianity by actually taking it seriously, only, you know, taking all of it seriously (all 2000 years worth of confusing and contradictory dogma), not just picking and choosing the bits of canon that fit 20th century sensibilities. Which is a very clever thing to do.
Re Bad Science. It’s a good book, but I should warn you that it’s very much geared to a UK audience, in that it talks about some scientific scares and fads that have only occurred in the UK, so it may be a little confusing if you’re not familiar with the particular examples used. But I’m sure its main message about the ridiculousness of most science reporting could apply to anywhere in the world. Sadly.